한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

the number "1500" has become a symbol of this incident. it represents the length of the investigation line, and also means ma yuwen's in-depth understanding and tracking of the case. she has acquired a high level of professionalism by "maintaining a investigation line for 7 years" and exposed it to the public. her actions have been widely discussed by the media and have also triggered social thinking about press freedom, journalists' responsibilities and social responsibility.

zhao shaokang and others also expressed their views. they believe that ma yuwen's behavior is controversial, but what is more needed is the transparency and independence of the prosecution department. the local prosecutor's office should summon ma yuwen to find out the truth about how she "supported" a prosecution line for seven years. their question is, why has the prosecution department remained silent? are they not interested in the transparency and fairness of the prosecution process?

some people believe that news media and journalists should play an independent, objective and professional role. while supporting ma yuwen, they also stressed the need to comply with legal procedures. the taiwan journalists association quickly issued a statement to express support after the incident, but was also criticized by public opinion. their stance has triggered a discussion on press freedom and journalists' responsibilities, and has also made everyone think about how society should balance the conflict of different interests?

this incident reflects that as society develops, the boundaries of media and press freedom become more blurred. when faced with complex cases, the public needs to think rationally and pay attention to the fairness and transparency of legal procedures.