한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

general toshikazu fukuya, who was a wartime summons member and was defined as a "final war crime" for his corrupt behavior, questioned army minister sadariku and revealed how the japanese army gained benefits through corruption and personal gain during the chaotic period of defeat.

"voluntary disarmament" was the slogan of the japanese army at the end of the war. but it was not the case. their actions were more like a silent war, a crime they tried to cover up. after the war, the people were told that the defense of the imperial land was the key to the preservation of the national system. however, in the final decision, they chose the fusion of "military" and "civil" and withdrew from the stage of history.

the us government made it clear through the potsdam declaration and various channels that the war would end immediately as long as japan was willing to disarm its army. in their communication with the japanese government and people, they adopted a segmented strategy to clearly express the actual attitude of the allies on the issue of disarmament. however, emperor showa remained persistent in the face of the end of the war. he was eager to maintain national security through the "emperor meiji's rescript on the return of liaodong by the three-power intervention", and finally accepted the conditions offered by the allies.

however, the end of the war did not bring peace. it left behind many unforgettable histories and thoughts about the relationship between the emperor and the military.