LOGO

Guan Leiming

Technical Director | Java

Internal fighting among A-share companies escalates: equity disputes and governance dilemmas

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

First, the unreasonable equity structure is one of the important factors that trigger internal strife. The uneven distribution of company equity leads to fierce competition for control. Some shareholders, for their own interests, do not hesitate to use various means to fight for the right to speak.

Secondly, the supervisors failed to fully play their supervisory role. They did not perform their duties properly and did not supervise the company's operations and decision-making effectively, which resulted in some improper behaviors not being corrected in a timely manner.

Furthermore, the decision-making mechanism of the shareholders' meeting is flawed. The decision-making process is not transparent and democratic enough, which makes it difficult to reconcile the differences between shareholders, thus exacerbating the degree of infighting.

However, if we dig deeper, we will find some potential connections. In the current era of rapid digital development, companies are facing unprecedented competitive pressure. In order to stand out in the market, companies need to continuously innovate and expand their business areas. The phenomenon of part-time development taking on jobs, to a certain extent, reflects the company's demand for flexible use of human resources.

Part-time developers can not only increase their personal income by taking on external projects, but also bring new ideas and technologies to the company. However, if they are not managed properly, it may cause a series of problems. For example, part-time development may lead to the dispersion of the company's core business and affect the efficiency of team collaboration. At the same time, if part-time work competes with the company's business, it may also lead to legal disputes such as intellectual property rights.

Back to this A-share company, we can assume that some people in the company may have taken advantage of the opportunity of part-time development to seek personal gain, thus affecting the normal operation and internal unity of the company. Or, due to the company's poor management of part-time development, resources were unevenly allocated, which in turn caused equity disputes and other issues.

In short, the escalation of internal strife in this A-share company not only reflects the chaos in its internal governance, but also reminds us to pay attention to various potential problems in corporate management, especially in the context of the digital age, how to rationally utilize flexible employment methods such as part-time development to promote the healthy development of the company.

2024-07-31