한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

in the case, jiang was accused of being the driver who directly caused the child's death, but his family believed that it was not his fault, but the lack of the entire traffic environment that led to the accident. they believed that the child was under 12 years old when driving on the road, and the parents as guardians should fulfill their responsibilities. the organizer of the ride also had some responsibility, but did the highway management have any responsibility?

the lawyers' analysis of the case is also very complicated. some people believe that the driver is the main responsible party and must bear the corresponding compensation liability, even if he did not exceed the speed limit or violate traffic rules. but on the other hand, they also questioned the road management and the cycling organizers who participated in organizing the cycling, whether they should also bear the corresponding responsibility?

after the accident, jiang's family tried to seek compensation through mediation, but ultimately failed to reach a consensus and ended up having to return the money. this was undoubtedly the beginning of another tragedy.

from a legal perspective, the driver may face compensation and civil liability, but at the same time, we must also consider whether the road management and the cycling organizers involved in organizing the ride should also bear responsibility. should they fulfill their safety obligations and ensure the safety of the road section before the accident? this is a complex legal dispute, and the division of responsibilities and evidence collection involved have become very complicated.

in this process, the truth of the accident and the division of responsibilities became the focus.