한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

in the contract, the two parties agreed that the landlord needed the tenant to cooperate in viewing the house, and ms. wang and her husband said that they had the "right to refuse." they never violated this agreement, but the landlord believed that ms. wang's "refusal" meant a breach of contract. it sounds like both parties are on the verge of a dilemma, but in fact there are more and deeper contradictions hidden.

from a legal perspective, the lease contract clearly stipulates the responsibilities and obligations of both parties during the housing lease period. if one party fails to fulfill this obligation, it will lead to a breach of contract. however, between the two parties, this breach of contract does not directly correspond to the "breach of contract" in the legal definition.

lawyer wei junling believes that the law does not stipulate that people with illnesses need to inform the renter of the risk of death due to illness, or bear the liability for compensation for the risk of death. unless otherwise agreed, concealing the illness will not lead to the termination of the contract.

lawyer xu yongxing believes that whether there is a breach of contract in a housing rental relationship depends mainly on how the contract is agreed.

between the two parties, the words "refuse to view the house" in the rental agreement do not directly lead to the termination of the contract. ms. wang and her husband did not actually refuse to view the house, but only expressed the right to "reject".

if the rental contract does not specifically stipulate the tenant's physical condition, the landlord will be liable for breach of contract if he/she proposes to terminate the contract on the grounds of "concealing the tenant's illness". however, in reality, breach of contract in a housing rental relationship often affects the rental or sale price of the house, which requires consideration of the impact of objective factors.

in the legal world, the term "haunted house" has no clear definition; it more often represents a psychological state and cultural perception.